Problems in Pak-US ties need to be quickly resolved
Courtesy:- Salahuddin Haider
The Pak-US relationship has been tense for far too long. The Pakistan government, rightly irked by a series of incidents last year, had to take a stand in line with the general mood of the people. To opt for a parliamentary review of the entire gambit of bilateral ties, was a correct decision, and met a general approval. So far so good. True, sensitive matters such as these, do need a careful consideration, and do consume time also, but procrastination simultaneously ought to have been avoided. If Islamabad was awaiting a formal apology from Washington for the Salala checkpost incident, the American administration too took shelter behind evasive statements. There were a spate of these from the State Department, the Pentagon, and those heading it, but all these statements fell short of expectations in this country. Media reports in the US did claim that PresidentObama was ready to apologise for last November’s military attack that killed 26 of the Pakistani soldiers, on guard duty , but the desecration of Holy Quran in Afghanistan, focused him to prevent the situation from deteriorating in a country where even milder mistake would have proved costlier for him and his troops, stationed there since a decade. Obama obviously found it difficult to tender yet another apology to Pakistan, lest his election prospects get spoiled because of that.
Hope has now been built up that the President during his address to the joint session of the Parliament on 17th of this month, may outline the broad features about the kind of ties we should have with United States. The President, and so has the Prime Minister, made it clear that pressures for giving up the Pak-Iran gas pipeline will be against the nation’s aspirations. United States should understand that its desire for Iran’s economic strangulation cannot be shared by sovereign States. India and China, have followed independent foreign policies, and have forged ahead in bringing prosperity for their people. If Pakistan, for some reasons and because of some autocratic or authoritarian regimes, preferred to accept dictation from outside, those leaders and their policies, vanished with their departure from the scene. A new administration, answerable to the people, is now in power.President Zardari at his Larkana speech some months back, had already made it abundantly plain that he and his government would do what it thought best for their country. Dictation to Islamabad was a thing of the past.Recently, a responsible US official advised Pakistan to look for alternate sources like windmills, solar power etc to meet its power shortages. Such lolly pops are least required. Pakistan has enough talent in science and technology, and it can make a nuclear shield for its safety, it can surely solve its energy problems. It would have been better, if the same US official had offered on behalf of the US government to install mega power plants, and help us build our nuclear energy resources, as the Americans have done for India. Perhaps such suggestions, may have carried more weight. Pakistan government, failing to provide the much needed economic relief to the people, and accused of corruption and misgovernance, has taken some bold decisions in the realm of foreign affairs. The change was visible after Hina Khar took over as Foreign Minister.
Having said that it must also be emphasized that Islamabad should never ignore the fact that America is not only an important country, it is also the only super power at present, and will perhaps be for a considerable period of time to come . It has to be friendlier to us, and respect us as a sovereign, independent country, capable of pursuing its own objectives. Future ties have to be on the basis of equality. As stated earlier Pakistan-US ties, at lowest ebb, are still retrievable, provided some genuine effort is made from both sides. Lip service would not be enduring, and is not in the interest of either country.
The Pakistani ambassador in Washington too must be conveyed the correct guidelines to play her role better. Her assignment, otherwise will be rendered meaningless. She has to present Pakistani viewpoint to the Americans. She can do this only when her perceptions about her governmentpolicies are clear to her. The Parliamentary Committee has taken rather too long to finish its work. Let us hope that the period of uncertainty will now end because the Americans too have been waiting for the recommendations of the committee and the government’s decision to act on that.
The Americans are genuinely worried over the unnecessary delay in the matter. They have been looking for alternate sources of transporting their supplies to their troops because of suspension of the Pakistani routes.
A bit of advice here will not be out of place that while the general opinion about the Americans is not very positive, the educated class, and those familiar with world histories and international scenario, consider US an important ally.
The Pak-US relationship has been tense for far too long. The Pakistan government, rightly irked by a series of incidents last year, had to take a stand in line with the general mood of the people. To opt for a parliamentary review of the entire gambit of bilateral ties, was a correct decision, and met a general approval. So far so good. True, sensitive matters such as these, do need a careful consideration, and do consume time also, but procrastination simultaneously ought to have been avoided. If Islamabad was awaiting a formal apology from Washington for the Salala checkpost incident, the American administration too took shelter behind evasive statements. There were a spate of these from the State Department, the Pentagon, and those heading it, but all these statements fell short of expectations in this country. Media reports in the US did claim that PresidentObama was ready to apologise for last November’s military attack that killed 26 of the Pakistani soldiers, on guard duty , but the desecration of Holy Quran in Afghanistan, focused him to prevent the situation from deteriorating in a country where even milder mistake would have proved costlier for him and his troops, stationed there since a decade. Obama obviously found it difficult to tender yet another apology to Pakistan, lest his election prospects get spoiled because of that.
Hope has now been built up that the President during his address to the joint session of the Parliament on 17th of this month, may outline the broad features about the kind of ties we should have with United States. The President, and so has the Prime Minister, made it clear that pressures for giving up the Pak-Iran gas pipeline will be against the nation’s aspirations. United States should understand that its desire for Iran’s economic strangulation cannot be shared by sovereign States. India and China, have followed independent foreign policies, and have forged ahead in bringing prosperity for their people. If Pakistan, for some reasons and because of some autocratic or authoritarian regimes, preferred to accept dictation from outside, those leaders and their policies, vanished with their departure from the scene. A new administration, answerable to the people, is now in power.President Zardari at his Larkana speech some months back, had already made it abundantly plain that he and his government would do what it thought best for their country. Dictation to Islamabad was a thing of the past.Recently, a responsible US official advised Pakistan to look for alternate sources like windmills, solar power etc to meet its power shortages. Such lolly pops are least required. Pakistan has enough talent in science and technology, and it can make a nuclear shield for its safety, it can surely solve its energy problems. It would have been better, if the same US official had offered on behalf of the US government to install mega power plants, and help us build our nuclear energy resources, as the Americans have done for India. Perhaps such suggestions, may have carried more weight. Pakistan government, failing to provide the much needed economic relief to the people, and accused of corruption and misgovernance, has taken some bold decisions in the realm of foreign affairs. The change was visible after Hina Khar took over as Foreign Minister.
Having said that it must also be emphasized that Islamabad should never ignore the fact that America is not only an important country, it is also the only super power at present, and will perhaps be for a considerable period of time to come . It has to be friendlier to us, and respect us as a sovereign, independent country, capable of pursuing its own objectives. Future ties have to be on the basis of equality. As stated earlier Pakistan-US ties, at lowest ebb, are still retrievable, provided some genuine effort is made from both sides. Lip service would not be enduring, and is not in the interest of either country.
The Pakistani ambassador in Washington too must be conveyed the correct guidelines to play her role better. Her assignment, otherwise will be rendered meaningless. She has to present Pakistani viewpoint to the Americans. She can do this only when her perceptions about her governmentpolicies are clear to her. The Parliamentary Committee has taken rather too long to finish its work. Let us hope that the period of uncertainty will now end because the Americans too have been waiting for the recommendations of the committee and the government’s decision to act on that.
The Americans are genuinely worried over the unnecessary delay in the matter. They have been looking for alternate sources of transporting their supplies to their troops because of suspension of the Pakistani routes.
A bit of advice here will not be out of place that while the general opinion about the Americans is not very positive, the educated class, and those familiar with world histories and international scenario, consider US an important ally.
Comments
Post a Comment