Connecting with Kabul

Time for a new doctrine
Sartaj Aziz’s trip to Kabul seems to have worked out nicely. Abdullah Ghani not only accepted Nawaz Sharif’s invitation – he promised to visit “soon” – but also appreciated how the two countries now had an historic opportunity to transform bilateral relations, which should be based on mutually beneficial partnerships. That in itself is a welcome break from the Karzai days, when responsibility of almost everything going wrong in Afghanistan was heaped onto Pakistan, especially the intelligence agency.

There are a number of reasons for this turnaround. One, new administrations usually float such feelers, especially when the relationship has been under strain, to test the other side’s appetite for a break from past habits. It also wins political points, both at home and in the international arena. Two, Pakistan’s crackdown on militants since Zarb-e-Azb has put Afghanistan on the back foot. Kabul’s principal grievance has been Islamabad’s reluctance to go after militants long holed up in the tribal area. But now that the operation is in full swing, and Afghanistan is not helping stem the flow of terrorists across the Durand Line, Ghani is without Karzai’s favourite excuse, and must play ball in another way. And three, the American drawdown means Pakistan is once again the number one player/broker in the region. Whether Kabul likes it or not, it will have to be friends with Islamabad if both are to defeat their respective insurgencies; one has had a long sanctuary in Pakistan, while the other has been sponsored and armed by Afghanistan.
On the whole, breaking the ice has been a positive development for both countries, and the stage is apparently being set for high level talks. And since they have decided to push the reset button, both sides must make gestures and promises that signal the end of confrontation once and for all. Being neighbours, both must finally understand that they cannot afford to fight any longer, and must coexist one way or another. Developments must still be followed cautiously, though. The new Indian government also postured for peace, but took little time in reverting to its own brand of extremism. Better results and a more rounded approach are expected of Afghanistan. The country has seen far too much war, and must finally decide what path it needs to follow, and which countries to make friends of, if it is to survive in the new environment.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Young achievers

Courtesy:  Editorial AWAY from the negative publicity this country often receives is the heartening news that nine Pakistanis are on the annual ‘30 Under 30’ Forbes Asia list that showcases the achievements of young people who have come up with ground-breaking answers to global challenges. Be it poverty, lack of access to education and healthcare, improving women’s rights, or environmental change, Asia’s millennials are finding innovative and sustainable solutions. Spanning a region that contains 60pc of the world’s population, the Asia list, published on Tuesday, features 300 individuals from 24 countries. With 30 honorees in each of the 10 categories — the arts, technology, social entrepreneurship, healthcare, science, media, and more — these innovators are tackling issues of concern to their generation.
Read more

The Indus Water Treaty and the World Bank

Courtesy:- MALIK MUHAMMAD ASHRAF Pakistan and India have been involved in intractable discussions to resolve the dispute regarding construction of two hydro electric power plants namely Kishenganga and Ralte being built by the latter in violation of the provisions of the Indus Water Treaty. So in view of the stalemate on the issue Pakistan requested the World Bank which had brokered the accord and also assumed the role of guarantor of the Treaty, to  establish a court of Arbitration to resolve the differences between the two countries. India simultaneously requested the World Bank for the appointment of a neutral expert. The World Bank initially agreed to set up both the Arbitration Court and the appointment of the neutral expert. However in response to the Indian objection on two parallel processes which it maintained was not legally tenable, the World Bank decided to announce   a ‘pause’ and asking both the parties to resolve the issue through bilateral avenues.  Giving the r
Read more

Budget 2017-2018: an anodyne view

Courtesy:-   Malik Muhammad Ashraf Preparing a  budget  and selling it to the public, more so to political opponents, is an arduous undertaking even in the most affluent and developed countries, particularly when it comes to new tax proposals and measures aimed at keeping the corporate sector in good stead to spur economic growth. Besides generating much-needed revenue for the government, taxes also affect the people – changing their economic situation. This makes taxes an unpopular proposition. So every segment of the society tries to look at the  budget  from its own perspective and so there is always a mixed reaction on the  budget s presented by the governments. The exercise is even more excruciating in third world countries like Pakistan that are facing financial constraints. Therefore, not surprisingly the  budget  for 2017-18 presented by the PML-N government has also spurred a debate about who benefits and who loses as a result of it. The debate, however, lacks objectiv
Read more