Better Pakistanis
Courtesy:- Hajrah Mumtaz
TRAGIC irony, cruel
joke or absurd contrast, it’s hard to decide what to make of the distance
between several of this country’s grim realities and the self-proclaimed good
intentions of those who have taken it upon themselves to do something about
them — because, after all, no one was thrust into politics and everyone who
sits in a position of administrative power, be it in parliament or at a lower
tier, is there because they volunteered for the job.
Consider a couple of gems that have appeared
in the news in the recent past. On Nov 16, in its ongoing effort to improve the
lot of the people of minority religions whose fate it is to struggle on in this
country’s unedifying terrain, the PPP proposed that the word ‘minority’ should
be replaced with ‘better Pakistani’ in all official correspondence. Yes,
really.
At a seminar organised by the party’s human
rights wing in Lahore, PPP Senator Aitzaz Ahsan said that “the word ‘minority’
should be replaced with ‘better Pakistani’ as whenever it is attached with
anyone, it belittles the personality regardless of stature”. He added that the
PPP intended to pass a resolution in this regard, and that it is likely to move
a resolution carrying this demand in the National Assembly, too.
Shying away from
minority issues won’t make them vanish.
I’m sure that will go a long way to assuage
the anguish of the families of Shama and Shahzad, whose screams have not yet
died away in our consciousness.
There’s no issue with the logic underpinning
Mr Ahsan’s observation: putting a person in a category other than the majority
mainstream, based in fact though it may be, is the beginning of the process of
converting them into a ‘them’ as opposed to ‘us’, and from there a slide into
hostility is all too easy. But if only the problems with the Pakistani state
and people’s treatment of minorities, whether religious or ethnic, were so
easily solved, prejudiced mindsets so easily changed. Let’s send around a
petition to get ‘better Pakistani’ Asiya Bibi out of jail, and to stop Hindu
girls from being forced to marry persons beneath their stature, since the
former are ‘better Pakistanis’.
On the other side of the spectrum of the
inexplicable, on Nov 9 the Senate Standing Committee on the Commerce and
Textile Industry came up with a new idea to attract foreign investment: it
advised the government to cast about for the attention of wealthy businessmen
around the world who migrated — or whose families migrated — from Pakistan soon
after Partition. According to a report prepared by a sub-committee, back in
1947 some five million people, Hindu, Sikh, Parsi and Christian, left what now
constitutes this country and migrated to other parts of the world.
“Pakistan’s neighbouring countries, especially
India, are encouraging these emigrants to invest in India, instead of their
ancestral lands in Pakistani Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and
Balochistan,” says the report, adding that such people in Canada, America,
Europe, the Far East and the Middle East can be encouraged to invest in their
“historical homeland”.
According to the account published in this
newspaper: “The committee has called upon the government to highlight the
cultural heritage of non-Muslims in the country so that all these non-Muslims
who migrated from Pakistan ‘are able to develop a strong cultural, economical,
social and religious bond with their homeland’.”
Reportedly, 431 such prospective investors
have already been identified by the Board of Investment; one can only wish the
government godspeed in its efforts to create strong links with people who left
the country nearly seven decades ago, or their descendants. I can’t speak for
them, obviously, but it seems to me that anyone watching the systematic and
systemic abuse of the country’s minorities from afar would be aghast and, if
their roots lay in this piece of land, be grateful that they are not here to
potentially face the brunt of it.
Like so many other sectors, in this area too
Pakistan’s efforts towards improvement are piecemeal, tend to address symptoms
rather than the causes, and, frankly, ostrich-like — as if refusing to look the
issue in the face will somehow manage to render it without existence.
The solution to minorities’ predicament here
is on paper quite simple. A start could be made by making changes to
legislation open to misuse such as the blasphemy laws. At the same time,
improving access to education, poverty alleviation and investment in human
resource would go a long way towards raising the profile and power of
communities that are marginalised as much as a result of these factors as of
being from a minority religion. Meanwhile, identifying and successfully
prosecuting those that target people on the basis of religion would send out
strong signals about the state’s focus on inclusiveness.
Yet, somehow, all this seems a far cry in the
context of this country. Better, then, to just leave it at ‘better Pakistanis’.
Comments
Post a Comment