Panama Papers — facts

Courtesy:-  S Rahman 
There is some uproar in the media about the so-called Panama Papers that revolve around the offshore companies that are being painted as property of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif although it is a proven fact that both the Sharif brothers do not own any business abroad.

It is in fact Hussain Nawaz, Prime Minister's son who owns the offshore companies besides many apartments under them. These are bona fide, lawful properties of Hussain Nawaz who has not kept this ownership secret from anyone as he has already stated that he owned the offshore companies.
And as the facts go, Hussain Nawaz has been living abroad for many years and had invested there. The family members accompanying him had certain privileges under Pakistani laws and he had been doing business according to Pakistan's Foreign Act and other Pakistani laws including the income tax laws. According to these laws, any person who is living abroad for more than 180 days or more do not need to file the income tax papers and declare the assets.
Similarly those who work abroad know the fact that they are not questioned about their source of income.
As regards the frivolous allegations that certain circles are trying to level against Sharif brothers, these allegations could never be substantiated in the past nor is any concrete evidence available with anyone to prove these allegations now. Even Pervez Musharraf government failed to prove such allegations. In fact, General Musharraf had extensively probed their business issues but he could not establish anything illegal against them.
The fact remains that neither the Sharif family indulged in any sort of corruption nor did it whiten black money. Whatever the Sharif family earned, it was earned through labour and hard work of over 75 years.
It is also a widely known reality that the Sharif family fully follows all rules and regulations in doing any business.
As for the reports about PM's daughter Maryam Nawaz, there is no denying the fact that she is a trustee of Hussain Nawaz's offshore companies. Her name has been included as a trustee like various other people.
And who doesn't know that trustee is not the owner but a mere agent of the owner. All legal brains know it well that no trustee remains the owner of any business after his/her death and all businesses are run according to certain rules and regulations.In all, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's name is being used wrongly and all accusations being leveled against him or all the revelations of the Panama Papers are baseless and all Sharif family's offshore holdings are legal. It is also to be noted that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif regularly pays his taxes and has no funds abroad.
Moreover, Hussain Nawaz has also been abiding by the British law and laws of other countries where it is a legal way to avoid unnecessary tax via offshore companies. It is also on record that the assets of two sons of the prime minister are legal and they are paying their taxes regularly and that the wealth of the two sons is not illegal.
The background of Sharif family's struggle and predicament is known to everybody. Their companies were nationalised by the then government after partition in 1970s and the family was forced out of the country in late 90s and was not allowed to come back to Pakistan for a long time which compelled the family and Nawaz Sharif's sons to establish their business abroad.
As for the sons of PM Nawaz Sharif, they left Pakistan in 1992 and therefore they are not resident. Pakistani tax law "says that if you are not staying in Pakistan for more than 180 days, then you are not required to declare your assets.”
This allegation business is not new against the Sharif family that has been targeted under allegations of corruption in the past as well, with the accusations having never been proven true.
Even Nawaz Sharif's deadliest foes could not prove a single corruption case against him. Benazir Bhutto never hurled any accusation against Nawaz Sharif for corruption nor could Musharraf prove anything against him.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Young achievers

Courtesy:  Editorial AWAY from the negative publicity this country often receives is the heartening news that nine Pakistanis are on the annual ‘30 Under 30’ Forbes Asia list that showcases the achievements of young people who have come up with ground-breaking answers to global challenges. Be it poverty, lack of access to education and healthcare, improving women’s rights, or environmental change, Asia’s millennials are finding innovative and sustainable solutions. Spanning a region that contains 60pc of the world’s population, the Asia list, published on Tuesday, features 300 individuals from 24 countries. With 30 honorees in each of the 10 categories — the arts, technology, social entrepreneurship, healthcare, science, media, and more — these innovators are tackling issues of concern to their generation.
Read more

The Indus Water Treaty and the World Bank

Courtesy:- MALIK MUHAMMAD ASHRAF Pakistan and India have been involved in intractable discussions to resolve the dispute regarding construction of two hydro electric power plants namely Kishenganga and Ralte being built by the latter in violation of the provisions of the Indus Water Treaty. So in view of the stalemate on the issue Pakistan requested the World Bank which had brokered the accord and also assumed the role of guarantor of the Treaty, to  establish a court of Arbitration to resolve the differences between the two countries. India simultaneously requested the World Bank for the appointment of a neutral expert. The World Bank initially agreed to set up both the Arbitration Court and the appointment of the neutral expert. However in response to the Indian objection on two parallel processes which it maintained was not legally tenable, the World Bank decided to announce   a ‘pause’ and asking both the parties to resolve the issue through bilateral avenues.  Giving the r
Read more

Budget 2017-2018: an anodyne view

Courtesy:-   Malik Muhammad Ashraf Preparing a  budget  and selling it to the public, more so to political opponents, is an arduous undertaking even in the most affluent and developed countries, particularly when it comes to new tax proposals and measures aimed at keeping the corporate sector in good stead to spur economic growth. Besides generating much-needed revenue for the government, taxes also affect the people – changing their economic situation. This makes taxes an unpopular proposition. So every segment of the society tries to look at the  budget  from its own perspective and so there is always a mixed reaction on the  budget s presented by the governments. The exercise is even more excruciating in third world countries like Pakistan that are facing financial constraints. Therefore, not surprisingly the  budget  for 2017-18 presented by the PML-N government has also spurred a debate about who benefits and who loses as a result of it. The debate, however, lacks objectiv
Read more